Agenda and minutes

Additional meeting, Scrutiny Committee - Wednesday, 2 October 2013 6.00 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, South Oxfordshire District Council Offices

Contact: Jennifer Thompson  Democratic Services Officer

Items
No. Item

12.

Minutes

Purpose: to approve the minutes of the meeting on 3 September 2013.

Minutes circulated separately.

Minutes:

RESOLVED: to approve the minutes of the meeting held on 3 September 2013 as a correct record and to agree that the Chairman sign them as such.

13.

Performance review of Capita (Financial Services Contract) pdf icon PDF 320 KB

Report of the Head of Finance (attached)

Purpose: to review the performance of Capita in providing financial services during the review period of 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013.and make any recommendations to the Cabinet member for finance.

Minutes:

The committee considered the report of the Head of Finance setting out Capita’s performance in delivering the elements of the financial services contract from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013.

 

Mr Paul Howden, Revenues and Benefits Manager, Mr Darren Keen, Capita contract manager, and Mr David Dodds, Cabinet member, introduced the report and answered questions from the committee as follows:

 

·          The Cabinet member was pleased to see for the first time ever a full set of excellent ratings. He congratulated Capita on their performance particularly on improving performance in processing benefits.

 

·          The take-up of council tax e-billing was higher than in other councils, but still only ten per cent. The reasons were not known, but there had been no campaign to encourage people to switch.

 

·          The revenues and benefits service customer satisfaction survey was underway. Customer satisfaction had been rated good because there was not enough evidence to award a higher rating. The council’s main residents’ survey had not been undertaken in 2012/13 because of a lack of capacity.

 

·          The revenues and benefits call-centre was pro-actively managed to move staff from quieter to busier areas and have enough staff available to handle calls. However it was always hard to manage the inevitable peaks in calls on Mondays and around the times when all councils issued bills and central changes were introduced. It was not possible simply to hire ad-hoc temporary staff as training was required before they could be effective, and there was eventually a lack of space to put staff. Providing a better service at peak times had a cost attached. 

 

·          There were several stages in detecting and stopping fraudulent claims. Data matching between agencies picked up discrepancies; national initiatives and calls from the public identified fraud; and Capita staff referred cases which seemed suspicious for checking. A range of sanctions up to jail sentences were used as well as requiring the money to be paid back.

 

·          Of those who had been over-paid, about 60 per cent had arrangements to pay this back in small weekly amounts; 20 per cent were in the process of setting up arrangements; and the remainder of debts were written off or dealt with by legal means.

 

·          Fewer reminders for unpaid debts had been issued because of the transfer of the garden waste service to payment by direct debit; residents and customers paying quickly for services; and reasonably good payment times from larger organisations.

 

·          The different figures for the percentages of calls answered in 20 seconds referred to the revenues and benefits call centre (81 per cent) and the central switchboard (87per cent).

 

·          The switchboard had been upgraded to offer automated call options to direct callers, an option to connect to a named officer, and pointers to the website. The time to answer calls was measured after the automatic options section finished.

 

·          The savings from moving to one switchboard for both councils had been passed on to the council.

 

·          KPT2 measured the time taken to see everyone who came to reception, with  ...  view the full minutes text for item 13.

14.

Corporate Plan review pdf icon PDF 68 KB

Report of the Head of Corporate Strategy (attached)

Purpose: to consider the results of the year one review of the corporate plan, including an update on progress with the key actions, targets and measures included in the plan.

Minutes:

The committee considered the report of the Head of Corporate Strategy reviewing the first year of the corporate plan from April 2012 to March 2013.

 

Mrs Clare Kingston, Head of Corporate Strategy, and Ms Yvonne Cutler Greaves, Corporate Projects Officer, introduced the report and answered questions as follows:

 

·          The drop in the recycling rate in real terms reflected the national trend. The Environment Agency had stopped councils from composting street sweepings which reduced the recycling rate by about three percent. Officers were working on alternatives. An information campaign to improve the household recycling rate is starting this month.

 

·          Residents were informed about the council’s work through Outlook three times a year and through the website and new apps for smartphones.

 

·          Phase 2 of the Orchard Centre development in Didcot had been repeatedly delayed due to economic constraints, in common with many other large retail projects across the country.

 

·          Staff had focussed on reducing business mileage by scheduling their visits and working days carefully. The overall reduction in staff numbers also reduced the total mileage.

 

·          Businesses reaching the VAT registration threshold tended to be either expanding established small businesses or larger start-ups.

 

·          The audit of community-led plans would produce a comprehensive list of actions, some of which the district council could assist in delivering. Councillors noted that the community plan review group at the county council also periodically collated common actions from plans.

 

Councillors commented:

·          the increase in the visitor economy was disappointing and the council should consider withdrawing support altogether;

·          there was no clear link between reducing the number of councillors and supporting communities.

 

Councillors asked for more information about:

·          progress with the community infrastructure levy;

·          the role and remit of planning champions and how this complemented the roles of district councillors and planning officers;

·          the annual housing supply statement; and

·          the proposals for the Enterprise Zone budget.

 

The committee agreed to note the report and the progress made.